Peer Review

In attempts to keep this organized and straightforward, I will go through your learning resource heading by heading and make my comments this way.

Overview of the Resource

  • Very clear description that explains what you will be covering in this unit and why
  • Good job incorporating multiple sources
  • Spelling suggestion: switch the “a” before vocabulary to “the” in this sentence – “Learning about perimeter gives students a vocabulary and problem-solving skills relevant to measurement that is valuable in life beyond the classroom.”

Learning Theory and Design

  • Great choice in going with constructivism for your lesson. I think this will be especially beneficial with a math lesson as the students will be able to construct a deep understanding of measurements and their relationships. With constructivism, students relate information to prior knowledge which will help them create a concrete understanding of these essential math concepts. In addition, I think your use of various learning styles will be beneficial to the students overall learning. 
  • It seems to me that there may be a spelling error in this sentence. “Finally, we have used the experiential learning model promoting learning through reflecting and doing to design hands-on, “real world” activities for our students to complete.” The part that says “and doing to design hands-on” does not seem clear to me. Perhaps you could rephrase this sentence to say something like “Finally, we have used the experiential learning model to promote learning through hands-on activities and reflection.” 
  • Finally, it may be worth considering a second source in this section but that is totally up to you guys!

Context

  • Grammar correction: there should be a comma after “To remove barriers that these students may experience”
  • I love that you are incorporating images, audio etc. This will definitely help students with dyslexia but will also improve understanding for everyone as a whole

Technology

I think your chosen technology makes perfect sense and your rational explains how it will benefit the class. Great job!

Examples of Topics

  • It seems to me that subtopics 2 and 3 have a run on sentence. I would recommend putting a period where the first semicolon is in both and start a new sentence as the two sentences can stand alone by themselves.

Misconceptions

  • In your explanation of perimeter there should be a comma after “When students are presented with objects that are irregular”
  • Great choices for misconceptions and I love the diagrams you included!

Curricular Connections

  • Good use of the BC curriculum! 
  • No work needed here!!

Layout Plan

Essential Questions:

Your essential questions are very clear and well-articulated!

Learning Outcomes:
  • It seems to me that many of your learning outcome have multiple verbs that they are assessing. As we talked about in week 3, each objective should have one verb. You may want to consider switching your outcomes so that you are only assessing one aspect in each. For example, in your lesson 3 outcome, you say student will be able to define and demonstrate. What happens if a student can define, but not demonstrate? Are they demonstrating mastery if they can only do one or the other? This makes the assessment aspect tricky.
  • Another example of how you can make your outcomes more concise would be by changing your outcome for lesson 5 so it only includes one’s verb, preferably one from the highest level of Bloom’s taxonomy as it is your biggest assessment piece. Perhaps you could reword this objective to say something like, “Using the various knowledge gained throughout the unit, students will formulate answers to real world problems.”. Using the word formulate allows you to assess the highest level in blooms taxonomy while keeping it concise and only assessing one variable.

For further reading and guidance on these comments, I encourage you to take another look at this resource from week 3! https://tips.uark.edu/using-blooms-taxonomy/

Activities/Assessment:

Great work on the activities and assessment everyone! Your activities clearly relate to, and assess, your learning outcomes. I appreciate that you incorporated a lot of formative assessment before doing a final summative assessment piece. In addition, I can see various forms of interaction taking place throughout you plan which include student-student interaction, student-teacher interaction, and interaction with both materials and technology. Your use of technology is concise and shows clear benefits including the advantages it has for inclusive learning. I think your activities and assessment are very strong!

            Spelling and Grammar Corrections:

– Lesson 1 activity (a) description: comma after “When the student’s demonstration of measurement is correct”

– Lesson 1 activity (b) description: “In the same groups of 3-4 students will each find four items that will fit into a pencil box” – perhaps consider rewording? You could switch this to say, “each will” instead of “will each”.

-Lesson 1 activity (b) description: comma after “Once the students have their list”

-Lesson 2 activity (a) description: remove the “a” before teacher-led slides in the first sentence Lesson 2 activity (a) description: In the last sentence, add in “the” before saying Nearpod cork board feature

-Lesson 3 assessment: “Throughout the lesson there are a number of formative assessment tools, such as answering prompts on a corkboard and answering questions on short quizzes in the app.” – comma after lesson, no comma after tools

Final Comments

  • I love the template you guys used! Is there any way you could share the blank template with me for future reference?  
  • This is a really great lesson plan. Your activities are fun and hands-on which I think will really draw the students in. I particularly like the creating a zoo activity. I think you guys made really good use of technology and made sure to address inclusion every step along the way. I think if you touch up your learning outcomes your resource will be full proof and ready for use!

Photo Credits: Header photo by Icons8 Team on Unsplash

Molly,

Great video! This video would definitely be a good tool to incorporate into a lesson about descriptive language. I agree that this video would require some sort of prior knowledge as the time for thinking is brief. As a result, I agree that this would be most beneficial after an introduction of description language has been done. It would be a good way to reinforce the information and provide a self-assessment opportunity for students.

You mentioned incorporating this with the create your own monster activity which I think is a great idea! Another idea of an activity that could be done with this is a worksheet that prompts students to create their own short sentences based on specific headings that correlate with the video. For example, the video talks about how adjectives are used to describes nouns. The worksheet could provide a sentence stem followed by blank spaces that are labelled “noun”, “adjective”, “verb” etc. where students fill in the blanks with their own examples and ideas.

Overall, I think this video is a good tool to compliment other parts and aspects of a lesson on descriptive language!

Megan,

This video has a very clear explanation of what perimeter is. I think this video would be a good tool to use after the initial lesson on perimeter as it provides a visual of what perimeter is and allows students the opportunity to check in with themselves and do a self-assessment to see where they are at.

I think your idea for a designed interaction activity is great! Having students take the knowledge they have gained from the video and then go out and practice measuring stuff is a perfect way to create an active learning environment where students are working hands on to solidify their knowledge and understanding.

You mentioned using formative assessment for this which I think is a good idea. I personally think this activity is perfect for both formative and summative assessment! You could use this as a formative assessment first, and then have a final worksheet on it that is submitted for summative assessment.

Videos are a great way to help create an inclusive environment! As you mentioned, the video has subtitles which are good for learners who learn better from text. In addition, these subtitle can be autogenerated in to countless different languages which can help ELL learners! Another great thing about videos is that they allow students to return to them in their own time for further learning and support if they need/want.

Overall I think this is a good video that would be beneficial for teaching perimeter. I also think that the students would love Moby the robot!

Photo Credits: Header photo by Volodymyr Hryshchenko on Unsplash

My chosen video:

For my video, I chose this fun rap that talks about descriptive language and how we can use our senses to create images and vivid pictures. This video does not force the students to respond in any way. Instead, this video takes a more learner-generated approach where a fun song is provided in hopes that, “…users may voluntarily interact with the medium, either cognitively and/or through some physical response.” (Bates, 2019). By providing a fun and catchy song, students may internalize information and remember it more as it is something that recruits their interest. It has also been shown that, “…active engagement with music can impact the way that the brain can process information, enhancing the perception of language and speech…” (American Institutes for Research, n.d.). 

Photo by Solstice Hannan on Unsplash

Since this video does not have any inherent interaction, after would be a perfect time for designed interaction. As a teacher, you could implement any activity that centers around descriptive language. One of my initial ideas would be to get students to write a short paragraph or song describing a single event, real or fictional, using descriptive language. This would require students to slow down time, focus on a single moment, and use descriptive language. Without slowing down time in writing, the text is often rushed and reads as an agenda or list-like form. Slowing down time is a critical writing skill as it allows the writer to create a piece that flows eloquently. It allows them to create ideas that are fully developed, which in turn, lets the readers visualize, use their senses, and make connections to the text. This activity would flow and connect nicely with this video as the narrator in the video describes various single moments such as when he was at the beach in Puerto Rico. This activity could be done in various ways depending on your classes needs. It could be a written response, a response done through the use of technology, or a spoken response. This allows for the action and expression pillar from the UDL Guidelines to be enhanced by using multiple tools for construction, composition, and communication and allowing for various methods of response (CAST, 2018). Another idea that comes to mind is getting students acquainted with putting their senses into words through the use of a tactile activity. In this activity you would gather different items that students can experience with their senses. This could include things with different textures such as a soft feather and goopy silly putty, things that make different sounds, things with different smells and tastes etc. Hide the items in paper bags and have students describe what they are sensing with words. This is a great activity for enhancing the representation pillar from the UDL Guidelines as it, “…[provides] information through different modalities.” (CAST, 2018) in an active learning environment. This activity would work with verbal communication as its medium with a potential writing/typing piece if desired.

Photo by Adam Winger on Unsplash

Both of these activities are great in terms of assessment. With the writing piece, you could easily turn this into a writer’s workshop, which I went into great detail about is post 2. This would provide a chance for student-student interactions through the use of collaboration and peer editing, student-teacher interactions through the conferencing opportunity, and student-self interactions through the self-reflection that occurs after feedback has been received. Students would benefit from the various interactions and feedback, while teachers would benefit from seeing where the students are at, where they may need additional guidance etc. This activity would allow for both formative and summative assessment opportunities through the use of conferencing and a final submission (if desired). On the other side of the spectrum, the tactile activity would be a good opportunity for formative assessment. In this activity, teachers could gain a good sense of student’s current knowledge and abilities and see where they need further support and work with the content. These activities provide chances for both formative and summative assessments, as well as the use of various mediums. It is up to the teacher to decide what they feel is best for their current class, situation etc. and what they feel aligns best with the learning outcomes they are aiming to assess.

I personally really like this video and appreciate how it does not force a response from students but instead allows for learner-generated responses; however, if I were to make a suggestion for how this video could be more interactive, I would suggest potentially removing some of the descriptive language and leaving it blank for students to fill in with their own ideas. This would create more of an inherent approach although some students may still choose not to answer. I personally think altering this video to make it more interactive would actually take away from its effectiveness. I think it would be more effective to use it as fun tool to get learner-generated responses flowing and then pairing it with a designed activity afterwards.

If anyone is interested in reading more about why music can be beneficial in the classroom and for students learning, I have found a short article that lists some major benefits and discusses some strategies for incorporation. I wanted to include this as the video I chose centres around music! Hope you enjoy!

https://www.prosolutionstraining.com/resources/articles/the-benefits-of-music-in-the-classroom.cfm

Resources:

American Institutes for Research. (n.d.). How does music benefit your classroom or school community the most? National Center on Safe Supportive Learning Environments. https://safesupportivelearning.ed.gov/voices-field/how-does-music-benefit-your-classroom-or-school-community-most

Bates, A.W. (2019). Teaching in a Digital Age – Second Edition. Vancouver, B.C.: Tony Bates Associates Ltd. Retrieved from https://pressbooks.bccampus.ca/teachinginadigitalagev2/chapter/pedagogical-roles-for-text-audio-and-video/

CAST (2018). Universal Design for Learning Guidelines version 2.2. Retrieved from http://udlguidelines.cast.org

ProSolutions Training. (n.d.). The benefits of music in the classroom. ProSolutions Training. https://www.prosolutionstraining.com/resources/articles/the-benefits-of-music-in-the-classroom.cfm. 

Photo Credits: Header photo by Dylan Gillis

Chloe,

I absolutely love the GRR model. I too was in a class taught by Robin Wilmot and ever since her class I have been so passionate about things like scaffolding and the GRR model. They have definitely had a lasting impact on me and I am glad to see that others feel the same way! I think your groups use of the GRR model to teach perimeter will be really helpful for students while also giving you (or the other teachers) a great chance to assess where individuals are at and whether more support and practice is needed before progressing.

I love your groups focus on master-orientated feedback! My group has been very centred around this as well as we too feel it is critical to student development and success. I am curious as to what kinds of formative assessment you guys are using for your lesson. I do not have much personal experience with formative assessments in math so I am very interested in hearing more about this! Any chance you want to share? If not I look forward to reading about it more in your learning resource.

You have linked some great resources here! I have seen the Ross Greene video and absolutely love it; however, I have not seen the video that uses bowling as a metaphor for classroom learning and inclusivity. Very cool. I will definitely remember that one. The idea of hitting the harder pins and how this relates the Universal Design for Learning is so accurate and impactful.

In reference to the question you posed about healthy communication, I agree 100%. I think of this in terms of emotional literacy. Emotional Literacy is, “…the ability to read (identify), label, understand and act upon the feelings (emotions) of oneself and others in a healthy and socially acceptable manner.” (Buschbacher, 2019). This allows individuals to understand their own, as well as others, peoples feelings, self-regulate, and communicate effectively. I think when we teach emotional literacy in the classroom, it teaches students how to understand their feelings and what they need, and communicate it more efficiently. By teaching emotional literacy, I think we can accomplish the “culture of healthy communication” that you mention in your blog! I have linked an article below that I really like. It talks about emotional literacy and offers a variety of ideas for how to help teach and promote emotional literacy in the classroom! Have a read if you are interested and let me what you think.

https://www.edutopia.org/blog/helping-young-children-develop-emotional-literacy-maurice-elias

Resources:

Buschbacher, P. (2019, July 5). What is Emotional Literacy? . Continued. https://www.continued.com/early-childhood-education/ask-the-experts/what-is-emotional-literacy-23253

Elias, M. J. (2017, July 18). Helping Children Develop Emotional Literacy. Edutopia. https://www.edutopia.org/blog/helping-young-children-develop-emotional-literacy-maurice-elias. 

Cynthia,

Very interesting read this week. I agree that with the technology we have these days, working and learning from home is definitely possible. I like the two categories you split this post up into – employee enthusiasm and difficulties surrounding training. When you discussed employee enthusiasm and motivation, you mentioned having some sort of incentive and/or regulation(s). To me this sounds like it plays along the lines of behaviourism, would you agree? I think the incentive and/or regulations could be effective in creating motivation in employees; however, I wonder if there is any way to create more intrinsic motivation. What do you think? Do you think it is possible and if so, how? Do you think this would cultivate more long term success and happiness within the work sphere?

In terms of the difficulties surrounding training individuals, I agree that there are many more supports these days that can be utilized to increase efficiency. As you mentioned, the use of video, mentors, and online platforms for meeting are all great tools; however, my one concern is training that involves more hands-on work. This may not be applicable to you, but your post got me thinking about how this effects jobs and workers who need to be taught something that is hands-on. For example, learning how to do plumbing by watching a video is much more difficult than learning how to use online spread sheets from a video. I wonder what these type of work places think about online learning/working and how they are dealing with the adversity. 

Anyways, thanks for listening to my thoughts and questions and for getting me thinking about some different things!!

Photo Credits: Header photo by Volodymyr Hryshchenko on Unsplash

Universal design for learning is the idea of designing with the awareness of potential barriers in mind. It is going into planning with the mindset of “how can I create the least number of barriers possible in order to make this effective for everyone?” Thinking back, I remember there was a time in high school where I had an accident at volleyball practice that left me with a scratched cornea. I went to my history class the following day and I was having a hard time seeing the pictures that were displayed on the board with our lecture notes. As a result, I felt like my ability and opportunity for learning drastically decreased. My teacher was very understanding and later printed me out a copy of the notes and pictures so I could view it up closer with less harsh light, or view it when my eye healed; however, in the moment I felt so hopeless. Imagine someone who has to manage with something like this all the time. Imagine someone who just learns differently. It is not that I did not have capacity or ability to understand the material, but the way in which it was presented to me in that moment was a barrier. 

If you have time take a look at the TedTalk by Michael Nesmith. It does a great job explaining what the Universal Design for Learning is all about and why we need it.

When creating a lesson, we need to consider the potential barriers that can obstruct the success of individuals. How can we create lessons and content that is accessible to everyone? Originally, I had never thought of creating with the idea of barriers in mind; however, now that I am using this mindset, I think there are various things my group could put in place to help reduce barriers in our blueprint. In order to portray this in a clear way, I will go over the UDL pillars of engagement, representation, and action and expression in their own paragraphs below. 

To begin, I would like to start with the pillar of engagement. The pillar of engagement refers to providing, “…a variety of pathways into the learning environment and supporting self-efficacy.” (James, 2021). I want to start with this pillar as to me, it is the foundation of the learning environment. The engagement pillar is critical as it covers things like student engagement, the classroom atmosphere, motivation, and self-regulation. I feel my group has done a really good job establishing a basis for optimizing individual choice, scaffolding, and providing mastery-orientated feedback; however, there are a couple of things in this section that I had not considered before. The first thing that I think is important is to, “Minimize threats and distraction.” (CAST, 2018). As a group, we may need to consider ways to ensure this is in place, especially if we want to do a writer’s workshop in the unit. In order for a writer’s workshop to be effective, students need to feel safe and comfortable and trust their classmates and classroom environment. If they do not feel safe, there is a good chance they will not be willing to fully participate and share their work. In addition, another change we recently made (based on the recommendation of Heidi) was adding in a self-assessment piece in order to support the check points around motivation, self-regulation, and developing self-assessment and reflection. I think with this now in place, we have a much stronger assessment section and are working towards tearing down potential barriers. 

By The Applicious Teacher on TeachersPayTeachers

Next, we have the representation pillar. Although I feel my group has done a good job covering a lot of the checkpoints in this section, the perception, as well as the language and symbols section, have sparked some ideas for things we may want to add in. The main thing I think we should consider adding is an anchor chart that has various examples of adjectives paired with a symbol or picture. This allows for clarification of vocabulary, as well as alternatives for both visual and auditory information, all of which have their own individual checkpoint in the UDL Guidelines (CAST, 2018). This could work in tandem with my comment in the engagement section about creating a safe classroom environment and fostering community and collaboration. By working as a class at the beginning of the unit to create this anchor chart, we can, “Involve all participants in whole class discussions” and “Create an accepting and supportive classroom climate.” (CAST, 2018).

Finally, when considering the action and expression pillar, there are a collection of things that I think could be added to help promote learning. One of the most important things that stood out to me in section is the need to, “Vary the methods for response and navigation.” (CAST, 2018). A lot of my groups current blueprint centers around physically writing out information. It may be good for us to consider alternative ways for students to represent their knowledge such as using technology or speaking to convey their understanding. This would also satisfy the, “Optimize access to tools and assistive technologies.” (CAST, 2018) checkpoint by offering access to things like keyboards, alternative keyboards, speech-to-text options, and more. By instilling this into our blueprint, we would be providing students with the opportunity to show their learning in various ways while also encouraging and supporting the “Use [of] multiple tools for construction and composition.” (CAST, 2018). This supports their growth in multiple areas, provides practice with various tools, and better prepares them for their future. 

Overall, the UDL guidelines are a reference worth considering when planning in order to create lessons, tools, and an environment that lifts everyone up. When we try to create something with minimal barriers, we benefit not just those who need it, but everyone around us. This is the power of designing for inclusion.

References:

CAST (2018). Universal Design for Learning Guidelines version 2.2. Retrieved from http://udlguidelines.cast.org

James, Heidi. (2021, May 5). Universal Design. EDCI 335 – Learning Design for Technology-Mediated Environmentshttps://edtechuvic.ca/edci335/universal-design/

Nesmith, M.A. (2016, October 13). Why We Need Universal Design [Video]. TED. https://tedxboulder.com/videos/why-we-need-universal-design

Photo Credits: Header photo by Jess Bailey on Unsplash

Chloe,

I really enjoyed reading your blog post this week! I was super excited to see you talk about scaffolding as it is something I am super passionate about. I did an inquiry project on scaffolding and agree with you that if there is a carefully scaffolded plan in place, it really helps aid in the learning experience and set everyone up for success! I really enjoyed the video you attached and how it talks about utilizing various different methods for teaching. I think a lot of the time we get stuck in the mindset of only being able to use one approach but why not use multiple? There is nothing saying we have to stick with one approach and one approach only. I think using various teaching approaches allows us to accommodate diverse situations and needs. One method is not going to work for every situation. Sometimes students will benefit more from experiential learning, however, sometimes they need direct instruction first. By allowing ourselves to use multiple teaching methods we have more room to create lessons and environments for our students to succeed. I am really looking forward to seeing your interactive learning resource on perimeter! It will be exciting to get some ideas that I can potentially incorporate in my future classroom. Good luck to you and your group with the rest of the assignment and I look forward to reading it! 

Breanne,

One of the reasons I chose to respond to your blog this week was in order to answer the question you posed in response to my blog! I definitely see the connections between direct instruction and experiential learning (which I noted in my above response to Chloe). I think that students can greatly benefit from having a period of direct instruction and then having the opportunity to connect it to an experience after. In addition, although I do not have any personal experience utilizing inquiry-based learning yet, I definitely think that experiential learning could compliment inquiry-based learning as well. By having students embark on an inquiry and then finding a way for them to experience aspects of the inquiry, I think it could create really concrete understandings that are long lasting and useful. Thanks for posing these questions! What do you think in terms of experiential learning being used in tandem with inquiry-based learning? 

In response to your blog, I really like the diagram you included as it a great visual that clearly explains the concept of direct instruction in a very simple and quick way. By looking at this diagram I am able to see and understand direct instruction within seconds! It is very effective. I appreciated how you dove into two different definitions/perspectives of what people believe direct instruction is. I am wondering if you feel more connected to Cook, Holland, and Slemrod’s perspective or Flores and Ganz’s perspective? I personally have experienced Flores and Ganz extreme view of direct instruction in classrooms before; however, when I think of direct instruction now, I try to view it with Cook, Holland, And Slemrod’s perspective as I think direct instruction can be beneficial if done correctly. 

Finally, I 100% agree with your explanation of how our blueprint utilizes direct instruction. Although it is not the main focus of our design, it definitely has a role in it. I think its role is necessary in order to benefit the students and support their learning of a new concept. I agree that direct instruction will, and should, have its place in our interactive learning resource.

Photo Credits: Header photo by Volodymyr Hryshchenko on Unsplash

Prompt 2

Photo by Adam Winger on Unsplash

Experiential learning is a holistic approach to learning where individuals are provided with opportunity to experience and interact with information in order to develop a deeper understanding and connection to the material. It is a, “…’direct encounter with the phenomena being studied rather than merely thinking about the encounter, or only considering the possibility of doing something about it.'” (Smith, 2001). Throughout the years, many people have spoken about their interpretation of experiential learning. While everyone has a unique perspective on experiential learning, there are two main characteristics that persist: (a) “Experiential learning is an active process which engages the learner, not a passive process that happens to the learner.”, and (b) There is period of, “careful analysis and reflection of the experience [that] develops the learning.” (Experiential Learning Organization, n.d.). Experiential learning has roots in constructivism as the learner is being actively involved in the learning process. Constructivists, “…look at the learner as more than just an active processor of information; the learner elaborates upon and interprets the given information.” (Ertmer, P. A. & Newby, T., 2018). This is precisely what experiential learning attempts to accomplish through experience and reflection. 

If you are looking for a further description of what experiential learning is and how it works, I would suggest checking out this short YouTube video! It makes many connections to how experiential learning works in various situations and why it works.

When reflecting on my groups design blueprint, I believe we have utilized experiential learning through our writers’ workshop activity. In our writers’ workshop, students get to experience the writing process. This begins with the mini lesson where students are presented with the lesson and provided with the basics they need to participate. During this time teacher will often use mentor texts, share their own writing, and teach other key components of the lesson. Often, mentor texts are used as it allows you to take stories that students listen to, connect with, and actually internalize/remember to introduce new writing techniques, to encourage imitation of writing styles and techniques, and to aid and help the students writing overall (Dorfman & Cappelli 2017). In addition to mentor texts, sharing your own writing is also important during this stage as it is a form of modelling which encourages students to try out new strategies and skills and allows students to see teachers as fellow writers rather than just teachers which makes them more comfortable and willing to explain their ideas (Dorfman & Cappelli, 2017) and go on the journey of writing with you. After a sufficient amount of information, modelling, and brainstorming has occurred, student then moves into the independent writing stage. From here, we progress into the conferencing stage where students get to actively receive feedback on their piece. This can be from either peers or the teacher. Finally, after this rigorous process has taken place, the final stage where students get to share the work occurs. 

Photo by Wavebreakmedia on depositphotos

We decided to use the writers’ workshop as it is an experiential learning opportunity that allows students to take on the role of an author. Through this exciting and engaging opportunity, students get the chance to deepen their understanding of concepts and solidify it by actively learning and making sense of it in relation to their experiences and how it relates to the world. We believe that through the writers’ workshop students are more likely to achieve mastery of these skills and progress towards becoming strong and confident writers. In addition to these benefits, the writers workshop also provides the teacher with the ability to scaffold instruction for efficient learning, as well as differentiate learning to meet students’ needs. As a result, the individualistic nature allows teachers to utilize various learning theories for various students, as well as progress throughout the theories as the individuals needs change and/or progress. Students can receive more help in specific areas or can be challenged further by the teacher as needed.

I believe my group will keep this section of our blueprint for our interactive learning resource as it is a great interactive tool that has many benefits. In addition, I would love to utilize the writers’ workshop, and various other experiential learning opportunities, in my future classrooms as a teacher! The benefits are limitless! This post has stirred excitement in me for what teaching could look like. I cannot wait to begin utilizing experiential learning and to dive deeper into the other learning theories through my peers posts and my own research in attempts to gain more ideas on how I can best help my students truly learn.  

References:

Dorfman, L. R., & Cappelli, R. (2017). Mentor texts: Teaching writing through children’s literature, K-6 (2nd ed.). Stenhouse Publishers.

Ertmer, P. A. & Newby, T. (2018). Behaviorism, Cognitivism, Constructivism: Comparing Critical Features From an Instructional Design Perspective. In R. E. West (Ed.), Foundations of Learning and Instructional Design Technology. EdTech Books. https://edtechbooks.org/lidtfoundations/behaviorism_cognitivism_constructivism

Experiential Learning Organization. (n.d.). What is Experiential Learning? MTa Learning. https://www.experientiallearning.org/about-mta/what-is-experiential-learning/.

Pattern Based Writing: Quick & Easy Essay. (2019, July 20). Pros and Cons of Writer’s Workshop in Elementary and Middle School: Teaching Writing Fast and Effectively! https://patternbasedwriting.com/elementary_writing_success/pros-cons-of-writer%E2%80%99s-workshop-in-elementary-and-middle-school-part-1/. 

Sprouts. (2015, October 12). Experiential Learning: How We All Naturally Learn [Video]. YouTube. Experiential Learning: How We All Learn Naturally

Smith, M. K. (2001) ‘David A. Kolb on experiential learning’, the encyclopedia of informal educationhttp://www.infed.org/b-explrn.htm.

Photo Credits: Header photo by Ben White on Unsplash

Community Contributions – Week 1

REPLY 1

I definitely see where are you are coming from Megan; however, I do think that the previous classes that you (and I) have taken have resulted in a “confirmation bias” (Veritasium, 2011). The previous classes we were enrolled in seemed to paint behaviourism in a negative way and often didn’t consider the positive side of things. While I agree with your statement in the third paragraph about how individual’s basic needs and motivation are important, I think that they can still be accommodated within behaviourism if it is used efficiently. For example, if you were to be teaching a group of students new math concepts such as addition and subtraction, leaving them to try and figure this out on their own may not be effective. “What might be most effective for novice learners encountering a complex body of knowledge for the first time, would not be effective, efficient or stimulating for a learner who is more familiar with the content.” (Ertmer & Newby, 2018). This does not mean that you cannot include and use other theories in your practice as well. Maybe you use a combination of theories. Begin with behaviourism techniques for the initial lesson of a new concept and then move into inquiry-based project etc. In addition, I also believe that purposeful positive reinforcement can boost individual motivation. Verbal reinforcement and encouragement can be a great source of motivation especially if it is done purposely and not just to boost one’s ego. For example, if a student has a breakthrough with something they were really struggling with and you offer purposeful praise concerning their learning, the process they took, and how hard they worked, this can be very meaningful to them. This is straight out of the behaviourist handbook! I totally see where you are coming from and often struggle with the same thoughts and questions; but, I think we have to take the time to remind ourselves of the potential benefits of behaviourism as well. Pulling certain beneficial aspects from each of the learning theories can create a productive learning environment where students can prosper.

References

Ertmer, P. A. & Newby, T. (2018). Behaviorism, Cognitivism, Constructivism: Comparing Critical Features From an Instructional Design Perspective. In R. E. West (Ed.), Foundations of Learning and Instructional Design Technology. EdTech Books. https://edtechbooks.org/lidtfoundations/behaviorism_cognitivism_constructivism

Veritasium. (2011, March 17). Khan Academy and the Effectiveness of Science Videos [Video]. YouTube. Khan Academy and the Effectiveness of Science Videos

REPLY 2 –

Breanne, I loved hearing about your experiences! Not only were they insightful, but they provided me with some ideas I could utilize myself in my classroom. I loved the ideas you mentioned for teaching students about blood. Super cool! 

I agree with you that growing up most classrooms seemed to centre around a behaviourist model. I too have experienced similar systems to the card system you mentioned. I recently saw a classroom that had everyone’s name on the board, and they would slide the names up and down to different categories which consisted of excellent, good, average, poor, and very poor behaviour. Names would get slid up and down in front of the whole class based on how students were behaving. To me, this does not seem like a good way to meet students’ needs of psychological safety and belongingness. As you mentioned in your final statement of this paragraph, I completely agree that we cannot fully break away from the behaviourist theory of learning, and sometimes it is even necessary, but there are appropriate times to use it in a way that’s beneficial.  

I really appreciate your final statement in the third paragraph about how allowing individuals to learn in their own way allows them to succeed and get the most out of their learning opportunities. We are all unique individuals, and we all learn differently. In an interview I did with a behavioural specialist from Alberta, she told me that her teaching philosophy was that every student learns differently. It is not fair to them for us to expect to teach one way and have everyone pick it up. It is our job as teachers to learn about each student, find their strengths, weaknesses, and learning styles, and teach towards that. She explained that teaching in multiple ways such as showing a video clip, lectures, hands on work, incorporating movement, etc. as much as possible with each lesson can provide students with the chance to showcase their strengths, find an outlet that they actually enjoy and are engaged in, and help their overall learning experience. 

Finally, I agree that each theory has its place and can be utilized in a beneficial way. For me personally, I plan on utilizing all these in an intertwining way in attempts to create a classroom environment that meets everyone’s needs and helps individuals learn and prosper. For me, I would like to use constructivism but am still a little fuzzy on how to execute this in a classroom with young students. This is something I would like to look into further! If you have any insights or resources that would be helpful, please feel free to share them with me!

Photo Credits: Header photo by Volodymyr Hryshchenko on Unsplash

Post 1

Photo by Alexa Williams on Unsplash

Thinking back to my various learning experiences, there are experiences that stand out as outstanding opportunities and others that either challenged me or left me wanting more. On one side of the spectrum, I am reminded of a course I took about the historical and philosophical background of teaching and how politics affects education. This course really challenged me as I had little interest in the subject, which Park’s (2018) refers to as “intrinsic motivation”, and I found it hard to connect with the material and see its learning benefits and applications. As a result, my motivation levels plummeted, and I found it extremely difficult to devote my full attention to the content being covered. As noted by Park (2018), “Students without motivation feel no impetus or inspiration to learn a new behaviour and will not engage in any learning activities.” (p.1) and this was the exact situation I found myself in. In addition, a lot of the topics in this course were controversial. We were presented with various ideas from different philosophers and some of them were so different than anything I had heard that they were very hard to understand and accept. As I am older, my neural plasticity is more rigid (SmarterEveryDay, 2015) and integrating new knowledge into my schema can be difficult when it is vastly different from what I am used to and know. Finally, the way the class was run reflected the behaviourist theory of learning. Emphasis was put on recalling facts and we were often, “provided with conditions and prompts in attempt to elicit a specific response (Ertmer & Newby, 2018, p.5) . Although this type of learning has its place, I struggled not having the opportunity to discuss content and take an active role in my learning. With content that I found dry and hard to accept, and my motivation lacking, this environment really did not work for me. In order to succeed and do my best, I had to be very self-sufficient and go about the course in a manner that I knew was effective for me. Personally, I am very organized and goal orientated. “Goal setting is a key motivational process” (Park, 2018, p.3) and for me, this could not be more true. With this in mind, I knew that these measures were absolutely necessary if I wanted to succeed in this course. I took time outside of class to make various handwritten lists such as assignment due dates, weekly to-do lists, and what I like to call “inspiration and correlation” lists. These lists helped me know what I needed to do and when and helped me find inspiration and establish various connections to the content. This helped increase my motivation and engagement in the class allowing me to succeed; but make no mistake, this class was quite the challenge for me.

On the other side of spectrum, I have had experiences that have been outstanding and have shaped me as an individual and a learner. The first thing that comes to mind is a less formal type of learning experience. One day, my friend lent me a book that she thought I would like called “Extreme Ownership: How U.S. Navy SEALs Lead and Win”. I began reading this book and was blown away with how well I connected to the material. Clearly, I am no Navy SEAL; but the way they wrote the book really tapped into multiple techniques that reach various individuals and help them understand. They provided facts but also provided multiple stories and examples to explain these facts. Each fact was accompanied by a story of how it is used by SEAL teams, as well as examples and stories of how it connects to the real world. When considering that this is just a book and must stand alone, it does a really good job at teaching in various ways to vast audiences. I think that the book was able to effectively utilize cognitivism by creating a resource that allows you to reason, problem-solve, and process information actively. It provides the reader the opportunity and ability to “internally code” and, “…store information in an organized, meaningful manner.” (Ertmer & Newby, 2018, p.8).

Photo by Junior Ferreira on Unsplash

Another thing that stands out to me as a “good” learning experience are the various inquiry projects I have encountered throughout my educational journey. To keep this brief and simple, picking a topic you are interested in and getting to construct meaning and actively learn, have resulted in extremely high levels of learning for me. When participating in inquiry projects, your motivation often increases as it is something you are interested in. The intrinsic motivation that Parks talks about is there in full effect. In addition, you get the opportunity to find facts and associations, process information, reason, compare things to other viewpoints, discuss, relate content to the real world, reflect, and more. These skills and learning outcomes are related to behaviourism, cognitivism and constructivism. Inquiry-based projects allow room for all of the theories of learning to work together in a way that enhances learning and produces more in-depth knowledge. Inquiry-based projects are very individualistic and therefore can utilize various learning theories for various students. You may also progress throughout these theories as the individuals needs change and/or progress. Finally, inquiry-based projects allow students to become strong and independent learners which results in increased self-efficacy and motivation.

In conclusion, as mentioned by Ertmer and Newby (2018), “…successful instructional practices have features that are supported by virtually all three perspectives…” (p.15). I agree that all of the learning theories have their time and place. I also agree that effective use of learning theories play a critical role in student engagement and learning. This in combination with motivation are the key to successful learning. With that being said, how do we raise motivation in individuals? What can we do to help motivate students? I would like to provide this article as a starting point for these question. In “The Science of Raising Courageous Kids” by Martin Brokenleg and Steve Van Bockern, it is suggested that we must first fulfill individuals basic needs (belonging, autonomy, mastery etc.) in order for them to reach a state where they feel safe, comfortable, and motivated to learn. This is where this blog post is taking me next. I would love to hear my peers’ thoughts on this, and I look forward to exploring the questions about motivation more in my own time.

Photo Credits: Header photo by Artem Maltsev on Unsplash

Resources:

Ertmer, P. A. & Newby, T. (2018). Behaviorism, Cognitivism, Constructivism: Comparing Critical Features From an Instructional Design Perspective. In R. E. West (Ed.), Foundations of Learning and Instructional Design Technology. EdTech Books. https://edtechbooks.org/lidtfoundations/behaviorism_cognitivism_constructivism

Park, S. (2018). Motivation Theories and Instructional Design. In R. E. West (Ed.), Foundations of Learning and Instructional Design Technology. EdTech Books. https://edtechbooks.org/lidtfoundations/motivation_theories_and_instructional_design

SmarterEveryDay. (2015, April 24). The Backwards Brain Bicycle – Smarter Every Day 133 [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MFzDaBzBlL0&t=282s